Fat Burning Zone vs. Aerobic Zone Differences in Training
You’ve probably heard that there’s a fat-burning zone for cardio workouts, right? In fact, some machines even indicate a specific heart rate target to burn the most fat. But are they right? Is that the best place to target? What about improving aerobic capacity? Since it’s important to train for aerobic fitness too, does that mean you need to train twice, once in each zone?
Well, researchers at University of St. Thomas in Minnesota took 36 runners and did some detailed analysis of heart rates and fat oxidation vs. VO2 max (maximal oxygen uptake, a measure of aerobic fitness). Here’s what they found:
The best fat burning zone was at about 68% to 87% of maximal heart rate, while the best aerobic zone was between 59% and 76%. Note the big overlap. Translation: you can simultaneously optimize fat burn and aerobic fitness by targeting between 68% and 76%.
If you dig deeper, there are two other points worth noting: a) the difference in fat calories burned can differ by a factor of 2 or so; this means there really is a fat-burning zone, and b) there is a high variability from individual to individual so you can’t just assume these averages apply to everyone; you’ll need to do some testing on yourself to see which range is best.
This comes from Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 23(7): p2090-2095 (2009).
------------------------------------------------------
Skip The Leucine And Save Your Money
The University Of Texas released the findings of a study comparing the anabolic (muscle growth) effects of leucine added to a whey protein drink versus jus the whey protein drink. The timing was following a high intensity lower body workout. Turns out, there was no difference. So if you are paying extra for protein powder enhanced with leucine, save your money and just buy good old whey protein.
Applied Physiology and Nutrition Metabolism, 34: 151-161, 2009.
------------------------------------------------------
Exercise keeps dangerous visceral fat away a year after weight loss finds UAB study
Published: Thursday, October 29, 2009 - 11:00 in Health & Medicine
A study conducted by exercise physiologists in the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) Department of Human Studies finds that as little as 80 minutes a week of aerobic or resistance training helps not only to prevent weight gain, but also to inhibit a regain of harmful visceral fat one year after weight loss. The study was published online Oct. 8 and will appear in a future print edition of the journal Obesity.
Unlike subcutaneous fat that lies just under the skin and is noticeable, visceral fat lies in the abdominal cavity under the abdominal muscle. Visceral fat is more dangerous than subcutaneous fat because it often surrounds vital organs. The more visceral fat one has, the greater is the chance of developing Type 2 diabetes and heart disease.
In the study, UAB exercise physiologist Gary Hunter, Ph.D., and his team randomly assigned 45 European-American and 52 African-American women to three groups: aerobic training, resistance training or no exercise. All of the participants were placed on an 800 calorie-a-day diet and lost an average 24 pounds. Researchers then measured total fat, abdominal subcutaneous fat and visceral fat for each participant.
Afterward, participants in the two exercise groups were asked to continue exercising 40 minutes twice a week for one year. After a year, the study's participants were divided into five groups: those who maintained aerobic exercise training, those who stopped aerobic training, those who maintained their resistance training, those who stopped resistance training and those who were never placed on an exercise regimen.
"What we found was that those who continued exercising, despite modest weight regains, regained zero percent visceral fat a year after they lost the weight," Hunter said. "But those who stopped exercising, and those who weren't put on any exercise regimen at all, averaged about a 33 percent increase in visceral fat.
"Because other studies have reported that much longer training durations of 60 minutes a day are necessary to prevent weight regain, it's not too surprising that weight regain was not totally prevented in this study," Hunter said. "It's encouraging, however, that this relatively small amount of exercise was sufficient to prevent visceral fat gain."
The study also found that exercise was equally effective for both races.